The new generation of Samsung’s popular midrange is no different from the past, except for a chip change and a slight increase in battery capacity. Check out the Galaxy A53 with Wironal.
In recent years, Samsung has gained a lot of popularity and sales with the Galaxy A family of devices such as the Galaxy A12 and Galaxy A52. Accordingly, the Koreans recently introduced the latest products of their intermediate family in the form of three models, Galaxy A33 and Galaxy A53, along with the Galaxy A73.
The Galaxy A53 is no different from the previous generation, despite the chip change and a slight increase in battery capacity. Can these changes persuade users to buy the Galaxy A53? Check out the Galaxy A53 with Wironal.
Design and build quality of Galaxy A53
The Galaxy A53 is no different in size and structure from the previous generation; We are on the same side with the same 6.5-inch plastic phone with a matte body and glossy frame; Of course, the Koreans have made minor changes to the look of the phone to make their new mid-range design more in line with the flagship Galaxy S22.
The body material of the Galaxy A53 is no different from the previous generation; The back panel and frame of the device are made of matte and glossy plastic, respectively; While the screen of the phone is protected by a flat cover made of Gorilla Glass 5. Other than the relatively thick bottom edge, the other three-edged edges of the screen are not as narrow as we know from Samsung’s flagships; But they do not hurt your eyes either.
Weighing 189 grams, the Galaxy A53 is no different from the previous generation, and its dimensions are 8.1 ۴ 74.8 × 159.6 mm, which is slightly narrower (0.3 mm) and wider; But since the curvature of the frame surface of the device has been reduced just like the Galaxy S22, the Galaxy A52 does not sit comfortably in the hand. With all that said, the Galaxy E 53 is not as “bad” as a rugged device like the Poco X3, and working with it conveys a good feeling to the user.
It is difficult to distinguish the Galaxy A53 from the Galaxy A52 from the rearview, the shape of the camera protrusion, the order of the cameras, the location of the Samsung logo and the texture of the back panel of the two devices are very similar; However, the bulge thickness appears to have slightly decreased. On the rectangular protrusion of the A53, we see the “quad” camera set and LED flash.
Thanks to the OLED panel, the Galaxy A53 fingerprint sensor is located below the display. This sensor is of optical type and offers satisfactory accuracy and speed of operation. The Galaxy E 53 uses a USB 2.0 Type-C port on the bottom edge, But it does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack.
The Galaxy A53 is available in four colors: black, white, blue, and peach, and is IP67 certified, just like the previous generation; Understand that a Samsung mid-range phone can withstand up to 30 minutes of water pressure at a depth of one meter.
Galaxy A53 screen and speaker
At first glance, there is no difference between the Galaxy A53 and the previous generation; Both phones feature a 6.5-inch OLED panel with a resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels, a very good 405 pixel-inch density, a 20: 9 aspect ratio and a 120Hz refresh rate.
As expected, there is no adaptive refresh rate on the A53 mid-range phone; According to our reviews, in the One UI interface environment, the refresh rate is fixed at 120 Hz; But apps like Camera or Call of Duty run at a constant 60Hz refresh rate.
| Performance of Galaxy A53 display against competitors | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Parameters | Minimum brightness | Maximum manual brightness | Maximum automatic brightness | Native contrast ratio | Average color error | |||
| White | Black | White | Black | White | Default mode | The most accurate mode | ||
| Galaxy A53 | 2.44 | ۰ | 640.5 | ۰ | 1290 | ∞ | 3.3 | 1.9 (Natural) |
| Galaxy A52s 5G | 2.3 | ۰ | 607.5 | ۰ | 1305 | ∞ | 4.8 | 3.1 (Natural) |
| Galaxy A52 5G | 1.81 | ۰ | 542 | ۰ | 834.5 | ∞ | 5 | 2.9 (Natural) |
| Galaxy A52 4G | 2. 26 | ۰ | 587 | ۰ | 1230 | ∞ | 5.3 | 3.2 (Natural) |
| Galaxy S20 FE | 2.2 | ۰ | 608 | ۰ | 1270 | ∞ | 4.6 (Vivid) | 2.2 (Natural) |
| Nova 9 Huawei | 1.3 | ۰ | 572.5 | ۰ | 814.5 | ∞ | 6.6 | 3.7 (Natural) |
| Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE | 2.6 | ۰ | 669.5 | ۰ | 905 | ∞ | 3.7 | 1.2 (Original) |
| Poco F3 | 2. 35 | ۰ | 615 | ۰ | 1205 | ∞ | 3.1 | 1.2 (Original) |
* All benchmarks mentioned in this table have been implemented by Wironal.
According to Wironal measurements, the Galaxy A53 display behaves similarly to the previous generation in terms of brightness; The maximum display brightness was 640.5 in manual mode and a very good 1290 nits in automatic mode. On the other hand, the phone’s ambient light sensor also has a very good performance; This way, if you set the brightness settings to auto mode, the 53 screen will be readable in direct sunlight.
As you’d expect from Samsung’s flagship handsets, the Galaxy E 53 offers sub-color profiles Natural (the most accurate colors) and Vivid (eye-catching colors) in the display settings, which are defined on the sRGB and DCI P3 spaces, respectively; The A53 obviously produces colors more accurately than the previous generation. In Natural profile there is a very slight tendency to warm and in Vivid there is a relative tendency to cold.
The Galaxy A53 uses stereo speakers; Speakers that are located at the bottom edge of the frame and the top edge of the screen (integrated with the call speaker), respectively. A53 transmits mid-range and high-frequency sounds with the same level of accuracy as flagship devices; But in low frequency and bass sounds, they are not good, on the other hand, the volume is far from the best on the market.
Software and user interface of Galaxy A53
The Galaxy A53, like the Galaxy S22 family, comes with Android 12 and One UI 4.1 by default; So in appearance it is not much different from One UI 4. Earlier in the review of One UI 4 , we put the features of this user interface under a magnifying glass; But One UI 4.1 itself is experiencing minor improvements over version 4.0, which we’ll cover below.
RAM Plus was first introduced with One UI 4.0; Ability to allow the user to use 4 GB of smartphone storage memory as extra RAM; But with One UI 4.1, the user can choose the amount of this extra RAM from 2, 4, 6 or 8 GB.
The Smart Calendar feature allows the Samsung Calendar app to access the dates and times mentioned in text messages as events in the calendar. The Koreans say Smart Calendar will be compatible with the phone’s default messengers and apps such as Line, WhatsApp, Viber and Signal; But it is unclear what will happen to apps like Microsoft Thames and Telegram.
In One UI 4.1, Samsung introduces a feature called Smart Widgets that works similarly to Apple’s Smart Stacks, allowing the user to merge multiple widgets and switch between views by swiping. One UI smart widgets are available in three sizes.
Performance, gaming experience and charging the Galaxy A53
Samsung does not provide information about the name of the Galaxy A53 chip, and on the page related to this phone on its website, it is enough to just write the phrase “5-nanometer octa-core processor”. Our research shows that Samsung’s new midrange is powered by the Exynos 1280 chip.
The Exynos 1280 uses a combination of a 2.40 GHz dual-core Cortex A78 and a 6-core 2.0 GHz Cortex A55 as the CPU, and uses Arm’s 4-core Mali-G68 module as the GPU. The Exynos 1280 intermediate chip is also capable of connecting to 5G networks.
Galaxy A53 in three versions 6 | 128, 8 | 128 and 8 | 256 GB and the ability to upgrade the storage memory is sold through the memory card slot. We had a 256GB version of the phone with 206GB of storage available for review. The interesting thing about the Galaxy E 53 is that it reads much faster than the Galaxy A52s.
| Galaxy A53 storage memory performance against competitors | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Models / Performance | Sequential reading rate (MB / s) | Sequential writing rate (MB / s) | Random reading rate (MB / s) | Random writing rate (MB / s) |
| Galaxy A53 | 514. 41 | 495.25 | 233.56 | 202. 48 |
| Galaxy A52s Model 5G | 913.8 | 480.01 | 147. 16 | 156.23 |
| Galaxy A52 Model 5G | 925.53 | 509.8 | 151. 27 | 119.43 |
| Galaxy A52 Model 4G | 505.22 | 266.93 | 136. 98 | 130.83 |
| Galaxy S20 FE | 1572.95 | 674. 77 | 199. 44 | 236. 32 |
| Huawei Nova 9 | 1016. 49 | 742. 07 | 227. 59 | 275. 62 |
| Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE | 909. 32 | 759. 17 | 202.9 | 200.2 |
* All benchmarks mentioned in this table have been implemented by Wironal.
On its website, Samsung compares the Galaxy A53 with the Galaxy A52 5G and announces the superiority of its new phone;
| Performance of Galaxy A53 against competitors | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name and performance of the benchmark / product | PCMark | Speedometer 2.0 | GeekBench 5 | GFXBench | |||||
| Overall performance | browser | GPU | CPU | Game simulator (frame rate) | |||||
| Volcano / Metal | Single Core Multi Core | Aztec Ruins Onscreen / 1440p | Car Chase Onscreen / 1080p | ||||||
| OpenGL | Volcano | Metal | OpenGL | Metal | |||||
| Galaxy A53 (120Hz) | 11650 | – | 2544 | 748 1915 | 14 10 | 14 10 | – | 19 24 | – |
| Galaxy A52s 5G (120Hz) | 12295 | 49.6 | 2410 | 771 2793 | 19 13 | 20 14 | – | 28 33 | – |
| Galaxy A52 5G (120Hz) | 9529 | 45.2 | – | 647 1919 | 10 7.2 | 11 7.6 | – | 16 19 | – |
| Galaxy A52 4G (90 Hz) | 8517 | 39.3 | – | 533 1560 | 10. 6.9 | 10 7.0 | – | ۱۵ ۱۷ | – |
| Galaxy S20 FE (120Hz) | 12044 | 62.4 | – | 924 2751 | 31 22 | 18 20 | – | 40 47 | – |
| Huawei Nova 9 (120Hz) | 11263 | 47.3 | 2382 | 784 2964 | 19 13 | 20 14 | – | 28 33 | – |
| Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (90 Hz) | 10166 | – | 2307 | 790 3,000 | 20 13 | 20 14 | – | 29 33 | – |
| Poco F3 | 10213 | 66.8 | – | 973 3281 | 32 20 | 33 21 | – | 47 52 | – |
* All benchmarks mentioned in this table have been implemented by Wironal.
If we want to compare the Galaxy A53 with almost expensive products, we come to the Galaxy S20 FE 4G or 5G model. The 4G model of this phone gives you 40% faster CPU and 90% more powerful GPU compared to its mid-range brother.
| The performance of the Galaxy A53 in running mobile games | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mobile game title | Graphic settings of the game | Frame rate |
| PUBG Mobile New State | Ultra Graphics – Max FPS | 22 to 35 frames per second |
| Call of Duty Mobile | Medium Graphics – Very High FPS | 55 to 60 frames per second |
* All benchmarks mentioned in this table have been implemented by Wironal.
Wironal used GameBench software to obtain the above table frame rates.
The Galaxy A53 also did not perform satisfactorily at PUBG New State at an unstable frame rate of 22 to 35 frames per second. On the other side of the field, Call of Duty also offers Medium graphics settings at its best at 55 to 60 frames per second.
Increasing the battery capacity is one of the few improvements of the Galaxy A53 compared to the previous generation. Samsung’s new intermediate uses a 5,000 mAh battery to power it and also supports 25-watt wired charging; Unfortunately, the Koreans, after their flagships, have also removed the charger from A-series phones, including the A53.
| Battery performance of Galaxy A53 against competitors | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product ٫ Test | Display | Battery | Time required to charge | Video playback | PCMark |
| Dimensions and resolution | Million amp hours | Minutes: hours | Minutes: hours | Minutes: hours | |
| Galaxy A53 (120Hz) | 6.5 inches 2400 × 1080 pixels | 5000 | – | 18:27 | 12:13 |
| Galaxy A52s 5G (120Hz) | 6.5 inches 2400 × 1080 pixels | 4500 | 1:28 | 18:10 | 10:13 |
| Galaxy A52 5G (120Hz) | 6.5 inches 2400 × 1080 pixels | 4500 | – | 13:44 | 9:16 |
| Galaxy A52 4G (90 Hz) | 6.5 inches 2400 × 1080 pixels | 4500 | – | 15:17 | 11:52 |
| Galaxy S20 FE (120Hz) | 6.5 inches 2400 × 1080 pixels | 4500 | – | 14:41 | 8:30 |
| Huawei Nova 9 (120Hz) | 6.57 by 2340 x 1080 pixels | 4300 | 0:55 | 19:20 | 10:21 |
| Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (90 Hz) | 6.5 inches 2400 × 1080 pixels | 4250 | 1:00 p.m. | 25:00 | 11:00 |
| Poco F3 (120 Hz) | 6.67 inches 2400 × 1080 pixels | 4520 | 0:55 | 20:35 | 14:24 |
* All benchmarks mentioned in this table have been implemented by Wironal.
The Galaxy A53 offsets its disappointing performance against the competition with a very good charge. The Galaxy E 53 recorded a time of 12 hours and 13 minutes in the PCMark battery test; This means that if you do not use your phone heavily, the screen of the Galaxy A53 can stay on for up to 12 hours, which is a very good result.
Galaxy A53 camera
The hardware of the Galaxy A53 camera is no different from the previous generation. The smartphone uses a combination of four 64-megapixel wide-angle, 12-megapixel ultraviolet, 5-megapixel macro and depth-of-field cameras as a quad-rear camera, and a 32-megapixel module in the front as a selfie camera.
The Galaxy A53 wide-angle camera uses a 64-megapixel 1 / 1.7-inch sensor with 0.8-micrometer pixels on the back of a 26mm wide-angle lens with f / 1.8. Just like the previous generation, the wide-angle camera uses optical image stabilization and phase-detection autofocus.
The ultraviolet camera uses a 12-megapixel sensor with 1.12 micrometer pixels and an ultra-wide f / 2.2 lens with a 123-degree field of view. The Galaxy A53 uses a macro and depth gauge module with a 5-megapixel sensor and f / 2.4 lens, respectively, to capture close-ups and separate the subject from the background in portrait photography.
Dynamic range of Galaxy A53 camera
Ultraviolet cameras are usually placed lower than the main camera in terms of dynamic range, whether in expensive devices, intermediate and economical devices; So it is no surprise that the Galaxy A53 is in a similar situation. Looking at the wall of the building, one can see that the ultraviolet camera has lost many details due to direct sunlight; But the main camera was able to restore some of the details.
Note that the dynamic range of the Galaxy A53 main camera is not as wide as that of the flagship devices; Because it has not been able to fully restore all the details lost in the bright part of the image; But overall, the performance of the A52 family is much better than that of the Xiaomi 11 Lite.
Colors and details of the Galaxy A53 camera
At first glance, you can see the higher contrast of the main camera image. Both cameras record colors more saturated than they really are; But the colors of the main camera look more eye-catching. Magnifying the border between the dark and light subjects of the ultra-wide photo, you will notice a color distortion and a purple halo that is less noticeable in the main camera photo.
If you look closely at the slices created from the wide and ultra-wide photographs, you will notice that although we have considered the image frame the same when shooting; But again, the ultraviolet camera image is less detailed and softer than the main camera image.
Galaxy A53 camera performance in the dark
The Galaxy A53 has Night mode access with both its wide-angle and ultraviolet cameras; But Zumite studies show that Samsung intermediates generally increase the ISO level to achieve brighter photos when selecting Night mode while maintaining the exposure time. In any case, we also achieved a relatively long exposure of a quarter of a second when shooting with the Galaxy E 53.
The following wide-angle and ultraviolet images were taken with one-thirteenth and one-eighth of a second exposure and ISO 1,800 levels, respectively. The photo of the Galaxy A53 wide-angle camera is brighter and less noisy, and has eye-catching colors; But the Ultraviolet camera captures washed colors and little detail. In the colors of both photos, there is a tendency to warm.
Selfie and portrait photography with Galaxy A53
The Galaxy A53 captures portrait photos with the main camera and aided by the depth gauge module, and relies on a camera with a 32-megapixel 1 / 2.8-inch sensor and a 26mm wide-angle lens with an f / 2.2 aperture for selfies. As expected, portrait photos are captured with a resolution of four in one pixel, with a resolution of 16 megapixels; Surprisingly, selfies are upgraded from 8 megapixels to 12 megapixels after combining four by one pixels!
Samsung mediator works well in distinguishing the subject from the background; But there is no natural implementation of the bokeh effect and the whole background disappears evenly. Whether in selfies or portraits, the colors are eye-catching and the dynamic range is relatively wide; But the details of selfies are by no means on a par with the main camera.
Macro photography with Galaxy A53
If you have a lot of light and a stable subject, you will capture relatively attractive macro photos with the Galaxy A53; But due to the lack of autofocus, it is a bit difficult to record details, especially in moving subjects.
The Galaxy A53 is capable of shooting 4K video at 30 frames per second with all rear cameras (except macro cameras) and selfies; 4K videos have satisfying detail and attractive colors, and the dynamic range in them is wider than the average mid-range device. The bitrate of 4K videos is about 48 Mbps.
Summary and comparison of Galaxy A53 with competitors
The Galaxy A53 is not an inefficient phone in itself; Bright and precise OLED display, satisfactory daily performance, powerful camera and excellent charging of this phone will probably attract a lot of attention; But the Galaxy A53 isn’t the only midfielder, and it has little to say about some of Samsung’s own products.
| Comparison | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 FA 5G | Redmi K40 Xiaomi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| connections | ||||
| Wireless Network | Wi-Fi 802.11 a / b / g / n / ac, dual band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a / b / g / n / ac, dual band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a / b / g / n / ac / 6, dual band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a / b / g / n / ac / 6, dual band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, A-GPS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| NFC | Yes (market dependent) | Yes (market dependent) | Yes | Yes |
| Radio | Unknown | Unknown | No | No |
| USB | – USB Type-C 2.0 – OTG support | – USB Type-C 2.0 – OTG support | Type-C 1.0 Reversible connector, OTG support | – USB Type-C 2.0 – OTG support |
| Infrared | Yes | |||
| Battery | ||||
| Battery | Non-replaceable lithium polymer battery with a capacity of 5000 mAh | Non-replaceable lithium polymer battery with a capacity of 4500 mAh | Non-replaceable lithium-ion battery with a capacity of 4500 mAh | Non-replaceable lithium polymer battery with a capacity of 4520 mAh |
| Charging speed | 25 watt fast charge | 25 watt fast charge | – 25 watt fast charge – 15 watt wireless charge – 4.5 watt reverse charge – USB Power Delivery 3.0 support | – 33 watt fast charge (100% in 52 minutes) – Power Delivery 3.0 – + Quick Charge 3 |
| Body | ||||
| Dimensions | 159.9 by 75.1 by 8.4 mm | 159.8 by 74.5 by 8.4 mm | 163.7 by 76.4 by 7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 189 grams | 190 g | 196 grams | |
| Making | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame | |
| IP67 certified for dust and water resistance (up to one meter depth for 30 minutes) | IP67 certified for dust and water resistance (up to one meter depth for 30 minutes) | – Samsung P (Visa, MasterCard Certificate) – IP68 Certificate for water and dust resistance (up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes) | ||
| SIM card | Single SIM (nano-wire) or dual hybrid SIM (nano-wire, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (nano-wire) or dual hybrid SIM (nano-wire, dual stand-by) | Single SIM card (nano-wire or eSIM or both) or dual hybrid SIM card (nano-wire, dual stand-by) | Two SIM cards (nano-wire, one dual stand-by) |
| Platform | ||||
| Operating system at the time of release | – Android 12 – One UI 4.1 | – Android 11 – One UI 3.1 | – Android 10 – One UI 2.5 | – Android 11 – MIUI 12 |
| Chip | Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (six nanometers) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (seven nanometers +) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (seven nanometers) |
| CPU | 8-core (2.4 GHz dual-core and 2.0 GHz six-core) | 8-core (quad-core 2.4 GHz Kryo 670 and quad-core 1.9 GHz Kryo 670) | 8 cores (one core 2.84 GHz Kryo 585 and three cores 2.42 GHz Kryo 585 and four cores 1.8 GHz Kryo 585) | 8 cores (one 3.2 GHz Kryo 585 and three cores 2.42 GHz Kryo 585 and four cores 1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 | |
| Memory | ||||
| Memory port | microSDXC (using the second SIM card slot) | microSDXC (using the second SIM card slot) | microSDXC (using the second SIM card slot) | No |
| internal memory | 128 GB with 6 GB of RAM, 128 GB with 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB with 8 GB of RAM | 128 GB with 6 GB of RAM, 128 GB with 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB with 8 GB of RAM | 128 GB with 6 GB of RAM, 128 GB with 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB with 8 GB of RAM | 128 GB with 6 GB of RAM, 128 GB with 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB with 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB with 12 GB of RAM |
| Memory type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | ||
| Camera | ||||
| Main | 64-megapixel (wide-angle lens, 1 / 1.7-inch sensor size, phase-detection autofocus, optical image stabilization, f / 1.8) 12-megapixel (ultraviolet lens, f / 2.2) 5-megapixel (macro lens, f / 2.4) 5-megapixel Image depth detection sensor, f / 2.4) | 64-megapixel (26mm wide-angle lens, 0.8-micrometer pixel size, 1 / 1.7-inch sensor size, f / 1.8, phase-detection autofocus, optical image stabilization) 12-megapixel (123-degree ultraviolet lens, 1.12-micrometer f /2.2) 5 megapixels (macro lens, f / 2.4) 5 megapixels (depth detection sensor, f / 2.4) | 12-megapixel (26mm wide-angle lens, 1 / 1.76-inch sensor size, 1.8-micrometer pixel size, f / 1.8, dual-pixel autofocus with phase detection, optical image stabilization) 8-megapixel (73mm telephoto lens, size 1 / 4.5th , 1.0 micrometer pixel size, f / 2.0, autofocus with phase detection, optical image stabilization, triple optical zoom) 12 megapixels (13mm ultraviolet lens with 123 degree coverage, 1 / 3.0 inch sensor size, 1.12 micrometer pixel size f / 2.2) | 48 megapixels (26mm wide-angle lens, 1/2 inch sensor size, 0.8 micrometer pixel size, phase-detection autofocus, f / 1.8) 8-megapixel (119-degree ultraviolet lens, f / 2.2) 5-megapixel (50mm lens) Macro, 1 / 5.0 inch sensor size, 1.12 micrometer pixel size) |
| Capabilities | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Filming | 4K @ 30fps, 1080p @ 30 / 60fps; Electronic image stabilization-gyroscopic | 4K @ 30fps, 1080p @ 30 / 60fps; Electronic image stabilization-gyroscopic | 4K @ 30 / 60fps, 1080p @ 30 / 60fps, electronic image stabilization-gyroscope | 4K @ 30fps, 1080p @ 30/60/120/240 / 960fps, electronic image stabilization-gyroscopy |
| Salafi | 32 megapixels (wide lens, f / 2.2) | 32 megapixels (26mm wide-angle lens, 0.8mm pixel size, 1 / 2.8-inch sensor size, f / 2.2) | 32 megapixels (26mm wide-angle lens, 1 / 2.74-inch sensor size, 0.8mm pixel size, autofocus, f / 2.0) | 20 megapixels (wide lens, 1 / 3.4 inch sensor size, 0.8 micrometer pixel size) |
| Selfie filming | 4K @ 30fps, 1080p @ 30fps | 4K @ 30fps, 1080p @ 30fps | 4K @ 30 / 60fps, 1080p @ 30 / 60fps, electronic image stabilization-gyroscope | 1080p @ 30fps, 720p @ 120fps |
| Network | ||||
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Voice | ||||
| speaker | Yes, stereo speaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 3.5 mm jack | No | Yes | No | No |
| – 32-bit / 384 kHz sound – Adjusted by AKG | 24 bit / 192 kHz sound | |||
| Supply | ||||
| Another letter | – Galaxy S20 Fan Edition – Galaxy S20 Lite | |||
| Introduction | March 17, 2022 | 17 August 2021 | 23 September 2020 | February 25, 2021 |
| models | – SM-A536U – SM-A536U1 | – SM-A528B – SM-A528B / DS | SM-G781B | |
| Condition | Available, released September 1, 2021 | Available. Released on October 2, 2020 | Available. Released on March 4, 2021 | |
| Approximate price at the time of supply | About 400 euros | About 730 euros | About $ 450 | |
| Capabilities | ||||
| Sensors | Optical fingerprint sensor (below display), accelerometer, gyroscope, compass | Optical fingerprint sensor (below display), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass | Optical fingerprint sensor (below display), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass | Fingerprint sensor (next to the phone), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, light source detection sensor |
| + ANT | Bixby Voice Assistant with support for dialog voice commands | |||
| Other | ||||
| Colors | Black, white, blue, peach | Black, white, light green, light purple | White, blue, orange, green, red, pink | Black, white, blue |
| Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) | 0.72 watts per kilogram (head) | |||
| SAR EU | – 0.88 watts per kilogram (head) – 0.84 watts per kilogram (body) | |||
| Display | ||||
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED capacitive touch, 16 million colors | Super AMOLED |
| Dimensions | 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches (~ 84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches (~ 85.7% screen to body ratio) | 6.67 inches (~ 85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| resolution | 1080 by 2400 pixels, 20: 9 (5 405 pixels per inch pixel density) | 1080 by 2400 pixels, 20: 9 (5 405 pixels per inch pixel density) | 1080 by 2400 pixels, 20: 9 (5 405 pixels per inch pixel density) | 1080 by 2400 pixels, 20: 9 (~ 395 pixels per inch pixel density) |
| Bodyguard | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| 120Hz image refresh rate | – 120Hz image refresh rate – HDR10 support – 800nm brightness (HBM) | – HDR10 + – Always-on display – 120Hz image refresh rate | – 120Hz refresh rate – HDR10 + support – 1300nits brightness |
By paying much less and buying the Galaxy A52s, you will get the same photographic and visual experience similar to the Samsung A53 with much better processing and graphics performance, or by paying the same amount and buying the Galaxy S20 FE, you will get a more efficient flagship chip and camera. The Galaxy A53 is experiencing slight improvements compared to before and is powered by a weaker chip. On the other hand, in the same price range, among the Xiaomi products, you can find very powerful models such as the Redmi K40.
The Review
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
By paying much less and buying the Galaxy A52s, you will get the same photographic and visual experience similar to the Samsung A53 with much better processing and graphics performance, or by paying the same amount and buying the Galaxy S20 FE, you will get a more efficient flagship chip and camera. The Galaxy A53 is experiencing slight improvements compared to before and is powered by a weaker chip. On the other hand, in the same price range, among the Xiaomi products, you can find very powerful models such as the Redmi K40.
PROS
- Brighter and more accurate OLED display than ever before
- Clear and expressive stereo speakers
- Optimal camera performance day and night
- Four-year software support promise
- Very good charge
CONS
- Supply without charger
- A weaker chip than competitors and the previous generation
- Price tag close to economic flagships
